Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.5% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 481164:481209 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 28 2017
,
Jun 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india Revision Result N chromium@481163 14207220 +- 1076992 21 good chromium@481209 14148604 +- 1352648 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975554673043812336 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6677546814406656 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975548142541307712
,
Jun 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975547116548650448
,
Jun 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india Revision Result N chromium@481163 14189008 +- 896527 21 good chromium@481209 14205387 +- 1163968 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975548142541307712 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4511032166318080 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975541578871708432
,
Jun 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india Revision Result N chromium@481163 14170502 +- 1354367 21 good chromium@481209 14165499 +- 1018887 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975547116548650448 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6677546814406656 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975539565473429552
,
Jun 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india Revision Result N chromium@481063 13935879 +- 479084 21 good chromium@481209 13972951 +- 547927 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975541578871708432 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5150570781868032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 28 2017
Bisect bots cannot reproduce the regression.
,
Jun 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india Revision Result N chromium@481163 14120186 +- 1606727 21 good chromium@481209 14155102 +- 1067654 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975539565473429552 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4511032166318080 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975532017343149312
,
Jun 28 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author jeffcarp@chromium.org === Hi jeffcarp@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Jeff Carpenter Commit : 68444af30e59f730704616740707f77c90b27850 Date : Wed Jun 21 01:31:49 2017 Subject: Add support for --gtest_repeat to run-webkit-tests Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_max/browse_search/browse_search_google_india Change : 0.73% | 13839267.0476 -> 13940586.6667 Revision Result N chromium@481063 13839267 +- 1012766 21 good chromium@481064 14061703 +- 706527 14 bad <-- chromium@481066 14015750 +- 623504 14 bad chromium@481072 14059637 +- 844998 14 bad chromium@481082 14015659 +- 692440 14 bad chromium@481100 13962316 +- 296217 9 bad chromium@481136 13997137 +- 195811 6 bad chromium@481209 13940587 +- 726299 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975532017343149312 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5150570781868032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 28 2017