Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-2.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 481936:482115 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975580741037254544
,
Jun 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : khushalsagar Commit : de93e30d4aa72f1c1a5c88e2aafba0021697b351 Date : Fri Jun 23 23:03:46 2017 Subject: cc: Move pre-decoding for checkerable images to image worker. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_pinterest_infinite_scroll Change : 2.71% | 301706822.667 -> 309888241.333 Revision Result N chromium@482013 301706823 +- 5006789 6 good chromium@482039 300237541 +- 7635155 6 good chromium@482052 301618068 +- 7763923 6 good chromium@482058 301533076 +- 6793596 6 good chromium@482061 302159748 +- 7586003 6 good chromium@482062 309869785 +- 1095356 6 bad <-- chromium@482063 309699127 +- 1347343 6 bad chromium@482064 309656825 +- 1119437 6 bad chromium@482115 309888241 +- 1129972 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.pinterest.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975580741037254544 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4986001593729024 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 28 2017
Re-opening since this is about a memory regression, and the other bug is about a crash.
,
Aug 21 2017
khushalsagar: ping? This is a pretty large memory regression, and it does not look recovered.
,
Aug 21 2017
Sorry I missed this. Will take a look today.
,
Aug 23 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Jun 28 2017