New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 737386 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 736793
Owner:
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1%-2.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 481936:482115

Project Member Reported by sullivan@chromium.org, Jun 28 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017

Mergedinto: 736793
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : khushalsagar
  Commit : de93e30d4aa72f1c1a5c88e2aafba0021697b351
  Date   : Fri Jun 23 23:03:46 2017
  Subject: cc: Move pre-decoding for checkerable images to image worker.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_pinterest_infinite_scroll
  Change       : 2.71% | 301706822.667 -> 309888241.333

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@482013      301706823 +- 5006789      6      good
chromium@482039      300237541 +- 7635155      6      good
chromium@482052      301618068 +- 7763923      6      good
chromium@482058      301533076 +- 6793596      6      good
chromium@482061      302159748 +- 7586003      6      good
chromium@482062      309869785 +- 1095356      6      bad       <--
chromium@482063      309699127 +- 1347343      6      bad
chromium@482064      309656825 +- 1119437      6      bad
chromium@482115      309888241 +- 1129972      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.pinterest.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975580741037254544

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4986001593729024


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Owner: khushals...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Duplicate)
Re-opening since this is about a memory regression, and the other bug is about a crash.
Cc: hjd@chromium.org perezju@chromium.org
khushalsagar: ping? This is a pretty large memory regression, and it does not look recovered.
Sorry I missed this. Will take a look today.
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment