Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Black screen when attempting to launch Flash game
Reported by
greg....@rumbleentertainment.com,
Jun 26 2017
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.40 Safari/537.36 Example URL: https://rumblegames.com/kingsroad/play Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Create/Login in to game from address provided 2. Launch game 3. Attempt to progress to gameplay What is the expected behavior? Loading screens appear, user is brought to start/launch screen of the game. What went wrong? After initial splash screen the game stays on a black screen. Does it occur on multiple sites: Yes Is it a problem with a plugin? Yes Flash Did this work before? Yes 59.0.3071 Does this work in other browsers? N/A Chrome version: 60.0.3112.40 Channel: beta OS Version: 10.0 Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 26.0 r0 Also occurs when attempting launch from Facebook: https://apps.facebook.com/kingsroadgame/
,
Jun 27 2017
Able to reproduce the issue on Windows 10 with latest Chrome beta i.e, 60.0.3112.40 and specific to Windows(Unable to reproduce the issue in Mac 10.12.5), This is a regression since the same works fine on M59(59.0.3071.115)stable. Note : On Chrome M61 we have another issue where selecting the prompt to allow flash to run doesn't get honored.
,
Jun 27 2017
,
Jun 27 2017
So, just testing the site. It doesn't appear to be HTML5 by Default related. The black content appears after Flash has been granted access to a site. Once enabled I can hear the audio (i.e. it sounds like the swf is playing). It's generally unclear if this is a web platform issue or a Flash issue. A bisect will be important for clarifying this case.
,
Jun 28 2017
Able to reproduce the issue on windows 7 using chrome version 60.0.3112.40 and it is working fine on Stable 59.0.3071.115 and canary 61.0.3142.0. Please find the reverse bisect information as below Narrow Bisect:: Good :: 60.0.3112.45 -- (build revision 474897) Bad :: 60.0.3112.42 -- (build revision 474897) Unable to provide the tool bisect as the good and bad builds are from branch builds.Hence providing manual CL Omahaproxy Change Log:: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/60.0.3112.42..60.0.3112.45?pretty=fuller&n=10000 Unable to find the suspect from the above CL. Could any one from Dev team please help us in assigning to the appropriate owner for this issue. Thanks,
,
Jun 28 2017
,
Jul 3 2017
Could any dev from Internals>Plugins>Flash team please have a look into the issue as it has been marked as stable blocker. Thanks...!!
,
Jul 5 2017
I'm not sure that I see the case for RBS. Things appear to be working after .40 (i.e. 60.0.3112.45) and on 61.x. Unless I'm missing something, there doesn't appear to be an action required. Would it be possible to reconfirm the bisect?
,
Jul 5 2017
kavvaru@, can you please confirm the bisect?
,
Jul 5 2017
If that CL range is correct, I'd speculate that Charlies change may have fixed the underlying issue. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/c958784507ff188871ddbe78461876aa8463d3cd
,
Jul 5 2017
FWIW, I think my CL should only affect things if an interstitial page is showing, but it's possible. Agreed that it makes sense to close if no one can repro on 60.0.3112.45 or newer.
,
Jul 6 2017
Yes, got the same bisect again. Able to reproduce the issue on build 60.0.3112.42. Seems this is fixed in latest beta 60.0.3112.50 as unable to reproduce the issue. greg.lee@@ Could you please check the issue on latest beta 60.0.3112.50 and confirm from your end. Thanks,
,
Jul 6 2017
Fix confirmed on beta 60.0.3112.50. Can no longer repro.
,
Jul 6 2017
,
Jul 6 2017
[Auto-generated comment by a script] We noticed that this issue is targeted for M-60; it appears the fix may have landed after branch point, meaning a merge might be required. Please confirm if a merge is required here - if so add Merge-Request-60 label, otherwise remove Merge-TBD label. Thanks.
,
Jul 6 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tkent@chromium.org
, Jun 26 2017