Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
ServiceWorker.FetchEvent.MainResource.Status errors on Android Beta 60 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionBig graph: https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=93873788ff067d3718e89d7df8394ded Graph showing >=59, the latest value is 99.94% https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=f25b0130aa3e65d8428029c693290cc6 "Graph" showing 60 only, the latest value is 99.92% https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=429968feff257da6fa2016e6fa091dcc The abnormal source of failures is the generic ERROR_FAILED (not ERROR_START_WORKER_FAILED).
,
Jun 26 2017
,
Jun 30 2017
(blink-worker triage) Error rate is still gradually increasing: https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=177660ed5db44a49c6c2f22bfcf9f56e AFAICS, ERROR_START_WORKER_FAILED and ERROR_TIMEOUT are also a bit increasing.
,
Jun 30 2017
1. The rate of SERVICE_WORKER_ERROR_START_WORKER_FAILED is increased by BrowserSideNavigation. BrowserSideNavigation enabled: https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=51a2a26d51304dfee5ff48a68b186659 BrowserSideNavigation disabled: https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=5277d80e252965a37faccc8693889c8e I think this is because Chrome tends to create a new process for SW when BrowserSideNavigation (PlzNavigate) is enabled. 2. The rate of SERVICE_WORKER_ERROR_FAILED is increasing even in the same version https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=f0147e66c03dd621ba313d73f1ad7c13 I don't understand why yet...
,
Jul 1 2017
It looks like something strange happened externally between June 10-12. The number of page loads doubled temporarily: https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=c70e9b1c87026a4cbcd3885317348618 This just happens to line up with the Beta 60 release.
,
Jul 3 2017
I found a strange spike of ServiceWorker.MainFramePageLoad.RedirectChainLength during June 10-14. https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=d978bde5561eb865b17d5b1d04cb2065 It looks like that a site introduced a redirection related bug with Service Worker during that period.
,
Jul 24 2017
Handwavy conclusion is that both 59 and 60 dropped at the same time, so it was probably an external site change, not a Chrome regression: https://uma.googleplex.com/timeline_v2?sid=f706168347531179444af4261dd641b4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by falken@chromium.org
, Jun 23 2017