Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.6% regression in loading.desktop at 480313:480339 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083433373632640
,
Jun 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083423949923760
,
Jun 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to continue Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either good or bad. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/IMDB Revision Result N chromium@480312 116.833 +- 22.3663 21 good chromium@480326 113.893 +- 17.1314 21 unknown chromium@480339 112.327 +- 10.9155 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=IMDB loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083433373632640 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6148539115110400 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: add3c68a6c8aea99a4f7088193f99d5eaaa5b510 bad_revision : 84047549ac37bab70d7306566c912e59131f3e1f If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/IMDB Change : 7.70% | 113.689777778 -> 122.445166667 Revision Result N chromium@480312 113.69 +- 11.8383 9 good chromium@480328 113.938 +- 8.37105 9 good chromium@480336 115.443 +- 13.3352 9 good chromium@480340 114.638 +- 15.4865 14 good chromium@480342 121.808 +- 11.241 9 bad chromium@480343 124.144 +- 13.2468 9 bad chromium@480374 123.768 +- 9.90554 6 bad chromium@480436 122.445 +- 11.9491 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=IMDB loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083423949923760 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6360511991513088 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976075722365387856
,
Jun 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Yutaka Hirano Commit : 84047549ac37bab70d7306566c912e59131f3e1f Date : Mon Jun 19 04:16:15 2017 Subject: [Loading] Save one post-task when the data pipe is ready on arrival Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/IMDB Change : 8.84% | 115.164888889 -> 125.346666667 Revision Result N chromium@480312 115.165 +- 15.033 9 good chromium@480328 114.509 +- 13.9013 9 good chromium@480336 114.512 +- 13.977 9 good chromium@480340 114.2 +- 8.84307 9 good chromium@480341 115.221 +- 15.657 14 good chromium@480342 123.116 +- 11.4619 9 bad <-- chromium@480343 125.206 +- 11.2398 9 bad chromium@480374 127.744 +- 4.01495 6 bad chromium@480436 125.347 +- 6.87403 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=IMDB loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976075722365387856 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6360511991513088 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, Jun 22 2017