Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.3% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 479754:479803 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083538940532624
,
Jun 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083532601093328
,
Jun 22 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author jbudorick@chromium.org === Hi jbudorick@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : John Budorick Commit : 1e16afc846438637e7be1dc19e02ccea8bc23685 Date : Thu Jun 15 18:37:04 2017 Subject: [android] 2 shards & 20 minute timeout for unit_tests on N Phone Tester. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news/load_news_irctc Change : 0.55% | 10075794.2857 -> 10087424.0 Revision Result N chromium@479753 10075794 +- 155132 14 good chromium@479761 9961472 +- 15325.8 6 good chromium@479764 9960789 +- 24174.5 6 good chromium@479765 9952597 +- 28030.9 6 good chromium@479766 10109147 +- 225095 14 bad <-- chromium@479778 10144085 +- 107190 6 bad chromium@479803 10087424 +- 37540.5 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.irctc system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083538940532624 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5004298624172032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 23 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author aleventhal@chromium.org === Hi aleventhal@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Aaron Leventhal Commit : 538180be326371b71af05d3ef299af5ce34e1d58 Date : Thu Jun 15 19:26:46 2017 Subject: Add blink input-range test Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news/load_news_irctc Change : 0.82% | 10155235.5556 -> 10072405.3333 Revision Result N chromium@479753 10155236 +- 165177 9 good chromium@479778 10106441 +- 192870 14 good chromium@479779 9925291 +- 13481.6 6 bad <-- chromium@479780 9932800 +- 19211.9 6 bad chromium@479781 9935531 +- 9459.31 6 bad chromium@479784 10027593 +- 340451 21 bad chromium@479791 10091520 +- 229321 14 bad chromium@479803 10072405 +- 92319.2 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.irctc system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083532601093328 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6747784629190656 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 23 2017
These CLs really don't look related at all.
,
Jun 23 2017
java_heap is not being very bisectable (issue 724032) :( Anyway, this looks like a land/revert with numbers coming back to baseline, so fine to WontFix |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org
, Jun 22 2017