New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 735927 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Sep 2017
Cc:
█ kraynov@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

29.1% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 479148:479375

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, Jun 22 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org, Jun 22 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=735927

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1peB_QgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11-air
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479147      424.267 +- 121.534      21      good
chromium@479375      413.25 +- 190.364       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083860529713712

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6377784605147136


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479147      433.212 +- 204.339      21      good
chromium@479375      427.518 +- 189.657      20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976083838018762672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6689765392384000


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479147      428.24 +- 225.952       20      good
chromium@479375      422.244 +- 170.055      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976049291323672928

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6689765392384000


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479147      430.568 +- 197.035      21      good
chromium@479375      418.746 +- 155.443      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976049294603314544

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6377784605147136


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 11 by sullivan@chromium.org, Sep 21 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This benchmark has been deprecated.
►

Sign in to add a comment