New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 735914 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

31.9% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 479376:479511

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, Jun 22 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=735914

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9pmJ3woM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11-air
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479375      711.046 +- 280.955      21      good
chromium@479511      685.911 +- 252.75       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976084981915706512

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4625045898395648


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479034      685.415 +- 213.012      21      good
chromium@479147      695.372 +- 239.796      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976084975659636304

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5345370701299712


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479375      705.929 +- 252.911      21      good
chromium@479511      690.904 +- 287.77       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976079497216152416

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4625045898395648


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.fifa.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479034      696.548 +- 366.019      21      good
chromium@479147      697.425 +- 312.168      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976075725081363872

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5345370701299712


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Doesn't repro, even after bisecting on a wider range.

Sign in to add a comment