New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 735909 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Fixed
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ kraynov@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

89.7% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases at 480821:480850

Project Member Reported by kraynov@chromium.org, Jun 22 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by kraynov@chromium.org, Jun 22 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=735909

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgjoas-wgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-webview-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Fill Shapes

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480820      56.5089 +- 2.94062      21      good
chromium@480850      56.7927 +- 2.4105       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Fill.Shapes smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976085168288676464

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6330679819763712


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Fill Shapes

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480820      56.7673 +- 3.12737      21      good
chromium@480850      56.9752 +- 3.2891       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Fill.Shapes smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976085161393099664

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4637507343351808


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Fill Shapes

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480820      56.6119 +- 2.52947      21      good
chromium@480850      56.3843 +- 2.18418      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Fill.Shapes smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976053067743934320

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6330679819763712


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Fill Shapes

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480820      56.8073 +- 3.23605      21      good
chromium@480850      56.5738 +- 2.17933      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Fill.Shapes smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976049297973527808

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4637507343351808


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by sullivan@chromium.org, Jul 27 2017

Status: Fixed (was: Untriaged)
This recovered.
►

Sign in to add a comment