New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 735690 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Sep 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

413.3% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 480312:480312

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, Jun 21 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org, Jun 21 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=735690

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgjuShvwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-one
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@480311      731338 +- 3047650      21      good
chromium@480312      821840 +- 3419973      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976139941724622944

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5728251063828480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480311      1093347 +- 4105644      21      good
chromium@480312      912342 +- 3709482       21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976121022872149072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5728251063828480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Bisecting with a wider range.
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This recovered.

Sign in to add a comment