New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 735665 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 735666
Owner: ----
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.2%-19.6% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 480380:480528

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, Jun 21 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_instagram

Revision             Result                      N
chromium@480379      177104090 +- 72382427       21      good
chromium@480528      170373846 +- 164760389      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976141455996683584

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5796696333746176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_instagram

Revision             Result                      N
chromium@480379      178140538 +- 59398075       21      good
chromium@480528      177763197 +- 163828274      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976124797837703024

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5796696333746176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Mergedinto: 735666
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment