New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 735287 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 734930
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Mac
Pri: 1
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

29.6% regression in service_worker.service_worker_micro_benchmark at 479509:479592

Project Member Reported by falken@chromium.org, Jun 21 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by falken@chromium.org, Jun 21 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=735287

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9tyH5ggM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12

Comment 3 by falken@chromium.org, Jun 21 2017

Components: Blink>ServiceWorker
Labels: -Pri-2 Test-Performance OS-Mac Pri-1
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : service_worker.service_worker_micro_benchmark
  Metric       : concurrent_100_response_50_percentile/concurrent_100_response_50_percentile

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479508      99.84 +- 48.8612        21      good
chromium@479592      98.3198 +- 49.0251      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests service_worker.service_worker_micro_benchmark

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976220686469672624

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6097620935639040


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : service_worker.service_worker_micro_benchmark
  Metric       : concurrent_100_response_50_percentile/concurrent_100_response_50_percentile

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479508      95.5962 +- 14.7012      21      good
chromium@479592      95.7533 +- 12.8234      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests service_worker.service_worker_micro_benchmark

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976215393797886176

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6097620935639040


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 7 by falken@chromium.org, Jun 23 2017

Mergedinto: 734930
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment