iFrame becomes unresponsive in multi-monitor setup
Reported by
o...@streak.com,
Jun 19 2017
|
||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.32 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: I tried to make them as small as possible, but unfortunately still complex. 1. Use a retina macbook pro (I have a late 2013 15" model) 2. Connect monitor to Apple Thunderbolt Display 3. unzip attached "brokenIframe.zip" file 4. install brokenIframe folder as an unpacked extension 5. go to the brokeniframe folder in your terminal 6. start a webserver on port 8000. (I used python -m SimpleHTTPServer 8000) 7. navigate to http://localhost:8000 8. You'll see the yellow modal come up and if nothing further happens that means a pop-up got blocked. Look at the address bar and go to the pop-up and authorize the app 9. the drive picker interface should now load up and be interactive 10. move the tab to the other monitor 11. notice that the drive picker interface is no longer interactive 12. move the tab back to the original monitor and notice the drive picker interface is interactive again What is the expected behavior? The drive picker should always be interactive. What went wrong? The drive picker became "frozen" and couldn't be interacted with when moved to another monitor. Here's a video demonstrating the issue: https://goo.gl/photos/f5oXoRLSQPGykpFv9 Did this work before? N/A Does this work in other browsers? N/A Chrome version: 60.0.3112.32 Channel: beta OS Version: OS X 10.12.0 Flash Version: This doesn't appear to cause a problem when using a non-retina macbook (i.e. older macbook air).
,
Jun 23 2017
As per comment #6&7 in-house team not having the permission to create a local host.Adding respective label to triage the issue further. Thank You!
,
Jun 23 2017
Correction : Point #6&7.
,
Jul 6 2017
,
Jul 11 2017
Does the scenario work well if the secondary monitor is placed at the right or bottom of the primary monitor?
,
Jul 11 2017
I'll check this first thing tomorrow morning. ᐧ
,
Jul 11 2017
I tried all arranging the monitors in all cardinal directions (i.e. primary monitor top, bottom, left, and right) and all exhibited the same problematic behavior. ᐧ
,
Jul 14 2017
,
Jul 20 2017
I have an updated/easier reproduction case so you don't have to run your own server. All the code is in this repository: https://github.com/StreakYC/brokenIframe New steps: 1. Use a retina macbook pro (I have a late 2013 15" model) 2. Connect monitor to Apple Thunderbolt Display 3. download the github repo zip (https://github.com/StreakYC/brokenIframe/archive/master.zip) and unzip it to a local folder 4. install brokenIframe folder as an unpacked extension 5. go to https://github.com/StreakYC/brokenIframe 6. You'll see the yellow modal come up and if nothing further happens that means a pop-up got blocked. Look at the address bar and go to the pop-up and authorize the app 7. the drive picker interface should now load up and be interactive 8. move the tab to the other monitor 9. notice that the drive picker interface is no longer interactive 10. move the tab back to the original monitor and notice the drive picker interface is interactive again
,
Jul 24 2017
I did a bisect and ended up finding the range below. It is already fixed in Chrome 61 which is our best candidate to fix this in. Try a dev or canary version and you will see it no longer reproduces. This is likely fixed by lfg@'s change because it is sending a resize event when the frame moves off a hidpi display to a low dpi display and vice versa. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/95f00bd53528fee18ef3ccaa08690c6a1996045d You are probably looking for a change made after 477789 (known bad), but no later than 477820 (first known good). CHANGELOG URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/e164e3ceab4dd13fb4e240e5d663e8ddb43b2a03..2b07f89b0ab15ff76a01ede77d347e90bdcc6582
,
Jul 24 2017
Thanks for the update! Since Chrome 61 is a couple of months away from stable is there anything we can do on our side in js/css/html to work around the issue (with the constraint that we still need the double embedded iframe structure)? |
||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||
Comment 1 by o...@streak.com
, Jun 19 2017