New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 734628 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 734629
Owner: ----
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

36.6% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 459370:459418

Project Member Reported by etienneb@chromium.org, Jun 19 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=734628

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgpuTbsgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12-mini-8gb
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                      N
chromium@459369      282379697 +- 231874204      21      good
chromium@459418      277070037 +- 221525335      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976339440000661184

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5145534815272960


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                      N
chromium@459369      287701233 +- 249824124      21      good
chromium@459418      293929369 +- 169815718      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976321090526043104

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5145534815272960


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Labels: -Performance-Memory Performance-Sheriff
Mergedinto: 734629
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment