New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 734624 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.1% regression in media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 478238:478273

Project Member Reported by dalecur...@chromium.org, Jun 19 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=734624

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9vDO8gkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@478237      65239430 +- 2416255      21      good
chromium@478273      65115418 +- 2037227      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976339559860541152

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4948789074329600


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@478237      65234735 +- 2506905      21      good
chromium@478273      64938532 +- 2479665      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976298441967218112

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4948789074329600


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Components: Internals>Media
Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.

Sign in to add a comment