Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.4% regression in image_decoding.image_decoding_measurement at 475945:476130 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976351658047894880
,
Jun 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976351041297875280
,
Jun 19 2017
,
Jun 19 2017
,
Jun 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : hans Commit : ba2ff9ad0d643a443575c839e56ae9edf7106643 Date : Mon Jun 05 02:02:06 2017 Subject: Revert of "win: Set is_clang=true by default over the weekend." Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : image_decoding.image_decoding_measurement Metric : ImageDecoding_avg/ImageDecoding_avg Change : 20.37% | 84.5334333333 -> 101.748958333 Revision Result N chromium@476914 84.5334 +- 4.91511 6 good chromium@476918 88.4213 +- 5.53301 6 good chromium@476920 87.6324 +- 7.57647 6 good chromium@476921 104.531 +- 9.91572 6 bad <-- chromium@476927 105.008 +- 3.77607 6 bad chromium@476940 101.749 +- 5.02349 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests image_decoding.image_decoding_measurement Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976351041297875280 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5640510871437312 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : khushalsagar Commit : 4e1be6ae8914f0eeed1df004b74a467bcb93241b Date : Wed May 31 21:45:49 2017 Subject: cc: Enable perf testing for checker-imaging. Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : image_decoding.image_decoding_measurement Metric : ImageDecoding_avg/ImageDecoding_avg Change : 42.31% | 60.8601333333 -> 86.6118166667 Revision Result N chromium@475944 60.8601 +- 1.00307 6 good chromium@476037 60.8071 +- 0.616818 6 good chromium@476040 60.866 +- 0.453673 6 good chromium@476041 84.194 +- 6.31997 6 bad <-- chromium@476042 88.536 +- 7.05759 6 bad chromium@476043 87.9802 +- 4.84668 6 bad chromium@476049 87.2272 +- 7.69991 6 bad chromium@476061 88.0405 +- 5.98309 6 bad chromium@476084 86.481 +- 6.49016 6 bad chromium@476130 86.6118 +- 6.64464 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests image_decoding.image_decoding_measurement Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976351658047894880 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5333802341105664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by chiniforooshan@chromium.org
, Jun 19 2017