Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.9% regression in thread_times.simple_mobile_sites at 478517:478517 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionI'm not sure how the switch from gcc to clang can cause this, bue the graph shows just this change when regression happened: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=7bcd03f22416c86976abb53ed65f461e070c8b3cc6250d78d17d1a7696f6f10e&rev=478517
,
Jun 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976608514687874736
,
Jun 16 2017
,
Jun 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : thakis Commit : f823f843f06636feb082521d76c282a16fe2d577 Date : Sat Jun 10 17:33:46 2017 Subject: android: switch from gcc to clang. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.simple_mobile_sites Metric : thread_IO_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_IO_cpu_time_per_frame Change : 2.35% | 3.00276099962 -> 3.07320933244 Revision Result N chromium@478516 3.00276 +- 0.0600864 6 good chromium@478517 3.07321 +- 0.0758905 6 bad <-- To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.simple_mobile_sites Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976608514687874736 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5976783188393984 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by chiniforooshan@chromium.org
, Jun 16 2017