New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 734090 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
charliea@chromium.org
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
chiniforooshan@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: 2017-06-24
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.6% regression in battor.trivial_pages at 479345:479414

Project Member Reported by chiniforooshan@chromium.org, Jun 16 2017

Comment 1 by chiniforooshan@chromium.org, Jun 16 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=734090

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9sK8qAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : battor.trivial_pages
  Metric       : story:power_avg/TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@479344      0.125612 +- 0.0422408      21      good
chromium@479414      0.126351 +- 0.0659943      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState battor.trivial_pages

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976617374868774080

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5018797578125312


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : battor.trivial_pages
  Metric       : idle:power_avg/TrivialWebGLPageSharedPageState

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479414      24.4441 +- 5.86898      21      good
chromium@479520      24.932 +- 3.24516       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialWebGLPageSharedPageState battor.trivial_pages

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976617104974142288

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4875116023906304


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : battor.trivial_pages
  Metric       : story:power_avg/TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@479344      0.124677 +- 0.0760308      21      good
chromium@479414      0.120393 +- 0.0196974      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState battor.trivial_pages

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976611750784757376

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5018797578125312


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : battor.trivial_pages
  Metric       : idle:power_avg/TrivialWebGLPageSharedPageState

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479414      24.4713 +- 7.87944      21      good
chromium@479520      24.1919 +- 4.83639      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialWebGLPageSharedPageState battor.trivial_pages

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976611755014448496

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4875116023906304


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 11 by charliea@chromium.org, Jun 22 2017

NextAction: 2017-06-24
Started one last bisect job with a wide range and hope that it's enough. It does look like there is indeed a regression here, though.
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : battor.trivial_pages
  Metric       : story:power_avg/TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@479147      5.74146 +- 0.264092      21      good
chromium@479657      5.90719 +- 2.65262       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState battor.trivial_pages

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976054578962962272

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6064181394014208


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : battor.trivial_pages
  Metric       : story:power_avg/TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@479147      9.94745 +- 0.820553      21      good
chromium@479657      9.9067 +- 0.303052       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialBlinkingCursorPageSharedPageState battor.trivial_pages

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976045524088284208

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6064181394014208


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 15 by charliea@chromium.org, Jun 23 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Closing this as WontFix, as it doesn't appear to be a real regression.

Comment 16 by monor...@bugs.chromium.org, Jun 24 2017 

The NextAction date has arrived: 2017-06-24
►

Sign in to add a comment