New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 734077 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Mac
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.3%-966.8% regression in loading.desktop at 479376:479579

Project Member Reported by chiniforooshan@chromium.org, Jun 16 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=734077

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9oLA6wkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1v3OlgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9tTg6QoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1ru7yAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtvmkkgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtq7RiQgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9sLRpAkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtoDY6AgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9vq2vgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9tT0-AoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9uTMnAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9rqL-ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtrOl2AgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtuDk7QkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtrWjuwoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9pCx7AgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9u36vgsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgttPW6wkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtpWTrwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtsv_owsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtu3zugsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqT7jgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqbk6goM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtsvR9AoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9oL3oAkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtreL5goM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqHetAkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtpG5pQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqmJ6gsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtpSx4gkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtpSx4goM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtuSg7wkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9u3fuQsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtra23AsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9tSP4wgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtvmkkgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9rqLugsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqTC8gsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgttPW6woM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqWvyQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgts2f_wgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtvmkkggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgto_qrQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtrHnhQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtuimtgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtpe17wsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9vr4tgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9rnmqgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtu3zugkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtpSx4ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtuimtggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1pfvigkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtt6ZjAgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtoW64QgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9sLRpAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1rOUkwsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqHK1QoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtrWjuwgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1te4uwgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9vj_iAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtu3zugoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqWvyQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9pCm9QgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtueu7QoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1vW6ggkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1pfvigoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtteZ5AkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtpD1sAkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9oTOpQsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqbk6ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9ry-4QoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9sLGuQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1ru7yAkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtqT7jgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg9pm4-ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtq7R8QsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtreL5ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtsrZmQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgto2y5AgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac11-air
chromium-rel-mac11-pro
Labels: OS-Mac
The problem seems to be mac specific.
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/TicketMaster

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479375      454.369 +- 57.6449      21      good
chromium@479511      444.068 +- 51.5708      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TicketMaster loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976620914074919696

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4973524193640448


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/Chosun


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Chosun loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976618193978349216

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6241747773947904


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/Chosun

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479381      497.783 +- 58.0733      21      good
chromium@479493      498.008 +- 51.6987      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Chosun loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976611744005745552

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6241747773947904


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/TicketMaster

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479375      460.331 +- 101.018      21      good
chromium@479511      446.503 +- 52.2056      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TicketMaster loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976611752561604304

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4973524193640448


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_tools/load_tools_dropbox

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479300      245.44 +- 376.578       21      good
chromium@479600      201.831 +- 247.098      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.dropbox system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976606266214683104

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6172787242172416


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Cc: sullivan@chromium.org kouhei@chromium.org simonhatch@chromium.org
Owner: sullivan@chromium.org
It looks like the bisect jobs failed: Simon, Annie, do you know why?
Cc: -simonhatch@chromium.org -sullivan@chromium.org
Owner: ----
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 19 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_tools/load_tools_dropbox

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479300      228.119 +- 319.488      21      good
chromium@479600      226.12 +- 314.675       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.dropbox system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976600427979631488

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6172787242172416


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 20 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Colorado.edu

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479381      119.99 +- 22.5741       21      good
chromium@479493      119.361 +- 19.4433      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Colorado.edu loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976598202805606560

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5555391330516992


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 21 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479381      246.186 +- 74.5043      21      good
chromium@479493      238.054 +- 39.3425      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976597605870811504

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6407211657461760


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 24 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Colorado.edu

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479381      119.115 +- 13.4208      21      good
chromium@479493      119.588 +- 13.8398      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Colorado.edu loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976592881204003728

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5555391330516992


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 25 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range

Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com
  Change       : 4.78% | 244.661357143 -> 237.849

Suspected Commit Range
  3 commits in range
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/c13482980f289f9386444ffd281c5baddb79829c..e33287b05658f232d0026256007df3e4981cdfc9


Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479381      244.661 +- 33.787       14       good
chromium@479382      247.406 +- 30.1086      9        good
chromium@479383      ---                     ---      build failure
chromium@479384      ---                     ---      build failure
chromium@479385      238.967 +- 46.9161      21       bad
chromium@479398      236.683 +- 13.5499      14       bad
chromium@479409      237.408 +- 19.906       14       bad
chromium@479435      236.35 +- 16.138        14       bad
chromium@479493      237.849 +- 33.2559      14       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976592877655047312

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6407211657461760


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Owner: simonhatch@chromium.org
Looks like the bisect bot results are different from perf bot result. bisects shows the metric in the range of 230-250 in the whole revision range, but there is a clear huge step in perf graph from around 240 to around 4700!

https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=b537ef1df797f010d5fda30bae4c831be209bf4169da28631450afcb6c4cc58c&rev=479493

I'll assign it to Simon (the current bot health sheriff). Simon, I suspect this regression (and the similar ones) are due some change in the bot. Could you please take a look?
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 29 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Colorado.edu

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479147      117.314 +- 17.6699      21      good
chromium@479493      117.696 +- 10.9629      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Colorado.edu loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976222629227669904

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4938410067755008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 31 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Colorado.edu

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@479147      119.562 +- 18.7567      21      good
chromium@479493      119.09 +- 17.9681       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Colorado.edu loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976215395967376576

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4938410067755008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
I don't see any change in the bot, looking at the before/after for loading.desktop for example on chromium-rel-mac11-pro, they both ran on seemingly identical hardware (swarming bot build129-b1).

I tried kicking one off without a story filter, in case that's the issue with the non-reproducibility.
Project Member

Comment 34 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Colorado.edu


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976162008214020240

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870877129834496


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 36 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 23 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Colorado.edu


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests loading.desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976068173680353168

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870877129834496


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
kouhei: many, many bisects couldn't reproduce this change seen in perf dashboard for loading.desktop. Anything we can do besides wontfix?
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
I think we can WontFix this as not reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment