New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 734027 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

7.8%-10% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic at 477038:477148

Project Member Reported by tebbi@chromium.org, Jun 16 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org, Jun 16 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=734027

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5riR5goM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5tGKuAsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12-mini-8gb
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Optimize:duration_avg/browse_tech/browse_tech_discourse_infinite_scroll

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477037      507.056 +- 131.528      21      good
chromium@477148      509.559 +- 136.622      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.tech.discourse.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976632299994243792

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5804093022404608


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Optimize:duration_avg/browse_tech/browse_tech_discourse_infinite_scroll

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477037      511.486 +- 177.22       21      good
chromium@477148      496.148 +- 53.0316      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.tech.discourse.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976611748667029424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5804093022404608


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by jochen@chromium.org, Jun 20 2017

Owner: tebbi@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

Comment 7 by tebbi@chromium.org, Jun 26 2017

not reproducible and test-cases seem to be abandoned

Comment 8 by tebbi@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment