Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976648970653069728

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : dtseng
  Commit : feef72d0d19c8336b0199b6b7c8ad10b0251f675
  Date   : Fri Jun 09 05:46:48 2017
  Subject: Rich editable text implementation using spannables

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_games/load_games_lazors
  Change       : 8.33% | 6291456.0 -> 6815744.0

Revision             Result              N
chromium@478159      6291456 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@478198      6291456 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@478208      6291456 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@478210      6291456 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@478211      6815744 +- 0.0      6      bad       <--
chromium@478213      6815744 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@478218      6815744 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@478237      6815744 +- 0.0      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.lazors system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976648970653069728

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6104588261785600


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!