Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.6% regression in thread_times.key_idle_power_cases at 479317:479331 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976696744435198976
,
Jun 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_idle_power_cases Metric : tasks_per_second_total_all/blank.html To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=blank.html thread_times.key_idle_power_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976696744435198976 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5026372692475904 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976517384294340032
,
Jun 19 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author delphick@chromium.org === Hi delphick@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Dan Elphick Commit : 95929fd549a3d944f945634fe50391ac4317bdf9 Date : Wed Jun 14 08:17:36 2017 Subject: Limit sending of BeginMainFrameNotExpectedUntil Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_idle_power_cases Metric : tasks_per_second_total_all/blank.html Change : 7.18% | 2.8965964696 -> 3.10448897717 Revision Result N chromium@479316 2.8966 +- 0.186067 6 good chromium@479320 2.87934 +- 0.0581318 6 good chromium@479322 2.92929 +- 0.195134 6 good chromium@479323 2.8963 +- 0.0999504 6 good chromium@479324 3.16325 +- 0.0577587 6 bad <-- chromium@479331 3.10449 +- 0.131058 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=blank.html thread_times.key_idle_power_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976517384294340032 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5026372692475904 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 19 2017
Looking a the traces it seems this patch just moved some events around a bit and does not constitute an actual regression.
,
Aug 17 2017
Issue 733752 has been merged into this issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by majidvp@chromium.org
, Jun 15 2017