Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.5%-32% regression in thread_times.key_silk_cases at 479147:479269 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976697103221547776
,
Jun 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976696547811590128
,
Jun 15 2017
The metric that regressed on Nexus 5 is thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame. One of the changes in the regression range (http://test-results.appspot.com/revision_range?start=479147&end=479249) is enabling the GPU scheduler (r479175).
,
Jun 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sunny Sachanandani Commit : f9a0da96d26ec1fe2121a8eef62f7bd7e9330555 Date : Tue Jun 13 22:16:40 2017 Subject: Enable gpu scheduler on waterfall and developer builds. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_silk_cases Metric : thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame Change : 9.47% | 5.60204354697 -> 6.13249837416 Revision Result N chromium@479146 5.60204 +- 0.079595 6 good chromium@479172 5.59573 +- 0.118739 6 good chromium@479174 5.57233 +- 0.0744293 6 good chromium@479175 6.05088 +- 0.0937384 6 bad <-- chromium@479176 6.04032 +- 0.0977873 6 bad chromium@479179 6.01229 +- 0.0966027 6 bad chromium@479185 6.04477 +- 0.0923399 6 bad chromium@479198 6.06424 +- 0.150443 6 bad chromium@479249 6.1325 +- 0.11361 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.key_silk_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976696547811590128 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5651558601064448 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sunny Sachanandani Commit : f9a0da96d26ec1fe2121a8eef62f7bd7e9330555 Date : Tue Jun 13 22:16:40 2017 Subject: Enable gpu scheduler on waterfall and developer builds. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_irctc Change : 32.00% | 3276800.0 -> 4325376.0 Revision Result N chromium@479146 3276800 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@479172 3276800 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@479174 3276800 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@479175 4500139 +- 957215 6 bad <-- chromium@479176 4325376 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@479179 4325376 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@479185 4325376 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@479197 4325376 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@479247 4325376 +- 0.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.irctc system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976697103221547776 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6229677103906816 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by majidvp@chromium.org
, Jun 15 2017