Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
309.7%-382.1% regression in loading.desktop at 478850:479090 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976709545741815696
,
Jun 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 91509778fd90e0964f86fa683b4dd4224cc8d3fe bad_revision : f5ec8bec81e8f54e11e0367836294357dd99c915 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/24h Revision Result N chromium@478849 1521.34 +- 799.369 14 good chromium@478894 --- --- build failure chromium@478895 1280.44 +- 1674.08 21 bad chromium@478939 1290.54 +- 1937.71 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=24h loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976709545741815696 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4616628785905664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976687254942228464
,
Jun 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 91509778fd90e0964f86fa683b4dd4224cc8d3fe bad_revision : 239d4798dfeee56d5b6feb44060a086c88e00557 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/24h Revision Result N chromium@478849 1454.56 +- 1691.48 21 good chromium@478894 1214.81 +- 1968.81 21 bad chromium@478939 1329.87 +- 1298.31 20 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=24h loading.desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976687254942228464 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4616628785905664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Aug 17 2017
This came back down a few revisions later. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by majidvp@chromium.org
, Jun 15 2017