Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3%-265.3% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 478959:479097 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 06ef13df196b1a7f427c5d440e982d48c34623e4 bad_revision : fd98b65e68c329ff0bb43db5a1c15e50aaa6c66d If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_max/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll Change : 205.59% | 1.58583333333 -> 4.84616666667 Revision Result N chromium@478963 1.58583 +- 0.29703 6 good chromium@479009 1.54033 +- 0.357241 6 good chromium@479021 1.58217 +- 0.321834 6 good chromium@479027 1.58583 +- 0.435278 6 good chromium@479030 5.65833 +- 1.05101 6 bad chromium@479032 5.3085 +- 0.76426 6 bad chromium@479055 4.84617 +- 3.42345 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976725423410399712 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6190467206610944 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976713678004446704
,
Jun 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 06ef13df196b1a7f427c5d440e982d48c34623e4 bad_revision : fd98b65e68c329ff0bb43db5a1c15e50aaa6c66d If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_max/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll Change : 214.73% | 1.66733333333 -> 5.24766666667 Revision Result N chromium@478963 1.66733 +- 0.443438 6 good chromium@479009 1.5375 +- 0.177103 6 good chromium@479021 1.583 +- 0.325951 6 good chromium@479027 1.58133 +- 0.200168 6 good chromium@479030 4.27856 +- 5.36258 9 bad chromium@479032 5.40817 +- 0.538255 6 bad chromium@479055 5.24767 +- 0.564184 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976713678004446704 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6190467206610944 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 19 2017
Believe this is a dupe, since it actually finds the same commit but for whatever reason the bisect thinks it's not yet done. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 15 2017