New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 733268 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.7%-52.8% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 478248:478369

Project Member Reported by tebbi@chromium.org, Jun 14 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org, Jun 14 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=733268

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1sDZ9QgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1ryD5AgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 14 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : Parse-Background:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478247      669.088 +- 346.759      21      good
chromium@478310      663.385 +- 250.023      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976800448389591584

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4996874588651520


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 14 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : Parse-Background:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478247      671.744 +- 220.946      21      good
chromium@478310      670.988 +- 278.999      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976789175824943376

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4996874588651520


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Owner: tebbi@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Assigning to performance sheriff.
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 16 2017

Cc: sky@chromium.org
Owner: sky@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author sky@chromium.org ===

Hi sky@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Scott Violet
  Commit : c510f5fdf094f135e32b42f33e23a8152af4b881
  Date   : Fri Jun 09 17:07:21 2017
  Subject: chromeos: adds InputDeviceController mojo interface

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : Compile:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll
  Change       : 4.88% | 127.188333333 -> 133.3965

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478280      127.188 +- 4.89115      6      good
chromium@478303      126.066 +- 2.07457      6      good
chromium@478309      127.451 +- 4.30979      9      good
chromium@478311      130.887 +- 5.8433       6      good
chromium@478312      135.113 +- 4.16718      6      bad       <--
chromium@478314      131.692 +- 2.79635      6      bad
chromium@478325      132.489 +- 6.09864      6      bad
chromium@478369      133.396 +- 3.83349      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976647596997361312

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4839060310327296


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment