New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 733257 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Verified
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Android , Windows , Mac
Pri: 2
Type: Bug

Blocked on:
issue 734908



Sign in to add a comment

CHECK failure in list_node in LayoutListItem.cpp

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Jun 14 2017

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5342123124850688

Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified
Job Type: windows_asan_chrome
Platform Id: windows

Crash Type: UNKNOWN READ
Crash Address: 0xd0a78880
Crash State:
  blink::LayoutListItem::UpdateListMarkerNumbers
  blink::LayoutObjectChildList::RemoveChildNode
  blink::LayoutObject::RemoveChild
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Recommended Security Severity: Medium

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_chrome&range=467203:467246

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5342123124850688


Issue filed automatically.

See https://dev.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/bugs/reproducing-clusterfuzz-bugs for more information.
 

Comment 1 by est...@chromium.org, Jun 14 2017

Cc: e...@chromium.org
Components: Blink>Layout
Related to https://codereview.chromium.org/2840613006 /  issue 713671  ?
Project Member

Comment 2 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jun 15 2017

Labels: M-61
Project Member

Comment 3 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jun 15 2017

Labels: ReleaseBlock-Stable
This is a serious security regression. If you are not able to fix this quickly, please revert the change that introduced it.

If this doesn't affect a release branch, or has not been properly classified for severity, please update the Security_Impact or Security_Severity labels, and remove the ReleaseBlock label. To disable this altogether, apply ReleaseBlock-NA.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
Project Member

Comment 4 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jun 15 2017

Labels: Pri-1

Comment 5 by est...@chromium.org, Jun 16 2017

Cc: -e...@chromium.org kojii@chromium.org
Labels: -Security_Severity-Medium -Security_Impact-Head -ReleaseBlock-Stable Security_Impact-None
Owner: e...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
eae, this is the CHECK you added in https://codereview.chromium.org/2840613006. Removing security labels since the CHECK should remove any security impact.
Labels: -Restrict-View-SecurityTeam -Security_Impact-None
Summary: CHECK failure in list_node in LayoutListItem.cpp (was: Crash in blink::LayoutListItem::UpdateListMarkerNumbers)
CHECK failure is not a security bug, we fixed the parsing logic on clusterfuzz side, sorry for noise. this is legit functional bug though.

Comment 7 by est...@chromium.org, Jun 19 2017

Labels: -Type-Bug-Security Type-Bug

Comment 8 by e...@chromium.org, Jun 19 2017

Cc: e...@chromium.org
Labels: -Pri-1 Pri-2
Owner: ----
Status: Available (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 9 by ClusterFuzz, Jun 19 2017

Labels: OS-Android OS-Linux

Comment 10 by kojii@chromium.org, Jun 20 2017

Cc: hayato@chromium.org
Project Member

Comment 11 by ClusterFuzz, Jun 21 2017

Labels: OS-Mac

Comment 12 by kojii@chromium.org, Jun 23 2017

Blockedon: 734908
Project Member

Comment 13 by ClusterFuzz, Jul 25 2017

ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 489151:489186.

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5342123124850688

Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified
Job Type: windows_asan_chrome
Platform Id: windows

Crash Type: CHECK failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  list_node in LayoutListItem.cpp
  blink::LayoutListItem::UpdateListMarkerNumbers
  blink::LayoutObjectChildList::RemoveChildNode
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Recommended Security Severity: Medium

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_chrome&range=467203:467246
Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_chrome&range=489151:489186

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5342123124850688


See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.

If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
Project Member

Comment 14 by ClusterFuzz, Jul 25 2017

Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified
Status: Verified (was: Available)
ClusterFuzz testcase 5342123124850688 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.

Sign in to add a comment