Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-138.8% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 477611:477708 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@477612 0.266689 +- 0.294904 21 good chromium@477688 0.258913 +- 0.232627 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976832558630377728 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6627533010763776 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976824339334856304
,
Jun 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976824330828640784
,
Jun 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976823147820167008
,
Jun 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : hpayer Commit : cf8f7bdc9d5ee314a10fe043e421ec95604d4eca Date : Wed Jun 07 13:21:28 2017 Subject: [heap] Increase memory reducer activation limit for external memory changes. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm Change : 0.95% | 1962548.66667 -> 1981244.0 Revision Result N chromium@477610 1962549 +- 324.933 6 good chromium@477644 1962492 +- 166.565 6 good chromium@477661 1962492 +- 166.565 6 good chromium@477670 1962703 +- 1396.01 6 good chromium@477674 1962526 +- 209.59 6 good chromium@477676 1962970 +- 1483.46 6 good chromium@477677 1962223 +- 1401.68 6 good chromium@477677,v8@f2cd359ac9 1964039 +- 1947.32 6 good chromium@477677,v8@d2066154c8 1965010 +- 1249.7 6 good chromium@477677,v8@cf8f7bdc9d 1981187 +- 223.815 6 bad <-- chromium@477678 1981244 +- 254.433 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm media.android.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976824339334856304 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4979317299216384 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@477612 0.271497 +- 0.278804 21 good chromium@477688 0.265578 +- 0.270628 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976823147820167008 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6627533010763776 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : hpayer Commit : cf8f7bdc9d5ee314a10fe043e421ec95604d4eca Date : Wed Jun 07 13:21:28 2017 Subject: [heap] Increase memory reducer activation limit for external memory changes. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/browse_social/browse_social_instagram Change : 118.27% | 4.9395 -> 10.7815 Revision Result N chromium@477674 4.9395 +- 0.528147 6 good chromium@477677 5.77 +- 6.70212 14 good chromium@477677,v8@f2cd359ac9 6.35819 +- 11.3448 21 good chromium@477677,v8@d2066154c8 5.26 +- 4.27265 6 good chromium@477677,v8@cf8f7bdc9d 11.8045 +- 4.03578 6 bad <-- chromium@477678 10.3293 +- 7.17233 14 bad chromium@477679 10.4407 +- 2.51323 6 bad chromium@477683 10.7527 +- 4.83655 6 bad chromium@477691 10.4112 +- 1.21337 6 bad chromium@477708 10.7815 +- 1.50899 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976824330828640784 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5790668296814592 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 14 2017