Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-132.4% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 477145:478106 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Revision Result N chromium@478106 8.12002 +- 3.18311 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976833312741728448 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5053160671936512 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976819374756303936
,
Jun 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-memory-mark-compactor_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Revision Result N chromium@478106 8.10639 +- 2.42786 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976819374756303936 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5053160671936512 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976380939833480544
,
Jun 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976380917989355440
,
Jun 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : jgruber Commit : 866ee63c581393185de63319aae94b21fc4069dd Date : Tue Jun 06 11:28:37 2017 Subject: [string] Re-enable result caching for String.p.split Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/load_media/load_media_youtube Change : 1.03% | 20053777.3333 -> 20259706.6667 Revision Result N chromium@477228 20053777 +- 68470.0 6 good chromium@477258 20035051 +- 64551.3 6 good chromium@477273 20057117 +- 85866.2 6 good chromium@477280 20033252 +- 53655.9 6 good chromium@477284 20058131 +- 103648 6 good chromium@477284,v8@c22ca7f73b 20049212 +- 56554.0 6 good chromium@477284,v8@866ee63c58 20294564 +- 87536.0 6 bad <-- chromium@477284,v8@a5838cc92b 20291901 +- 80698.7 6 bad chromium@477285 20271732 +- 62583.0 6 bad chromium@477286 20266181 +- 55390.2 6 bad chromium@477287 20259707 +- 51200.6 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.youtube system_health.memory_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976380939833480544 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5816122554712064 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : jgruber Commit : 866ee63c581393185de63319aae94b21fc4069dd Date : Tue Jun 06 11:28:37 2017 Subject: [string] Re-enable result caching for String.p.split Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/load_media/load_media_youtube Change : 1.16% | 19838992.0 -> 20068166.6667 Revision Result N chromium@477268 19838992 +- 30566.8 6 good chromium@477279 19837231 +- 23226.0 6 good chromium@477284 19834211 +- 3554.23 6 good chromium@477284,v8@c22ca7f73b 19825681 +- 42051.7 6 good chromium@477284,v8@866ee63c58 20066943 +- 51000.6 6 bad <-- chromium@477284,v8@a5838cc92b 20072009 +- 29718.3 6 bad chromium@477285 20064412 +- 4390.56 6 bad chromium@477286 20064899 +- 5354.6 6 bad chromium@477287 20065284 +- 32351.7 6 bad chromium@477289 20073020 +- 31718.3 6 bad chromium@477309 20066569 +- 12298.3 6 bad chromium@477350 20068167 +- 23695.9 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.youtube system_health.memory_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976380917989355440 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5680857928433664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 14 2017