New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 732857 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 731855
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

10.8% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 477444:477570

Project Member Reported by erikc...@chromium.org, Jun 13 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732857

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5sW1pAsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017

Mergedinto: 731855
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Ulan Degenbaev
  Commit : c8e6cdfdcee0319fec69926e074d047f668c6f8b
  Date   : Tue Jun 06 14:16:55 2017
  Subject: Revert "[heap] Use partial free when shrinking instead of uncommitting"

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_chrome/load_chrome_blank
  Change       : 10.79% | 5693440.0 -> 6307840.0

Revision                           Result              N
chromium@477443                    5693440 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@477447                    5693440 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@477448                    5693440 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@477448,v8@8a15026270      5693440 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@477448,v8@c8e6cdfdce      6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad       <--
chromium@477448,v8@5005faed5c      6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@477449                    6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@477451                    6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@477459                    6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@477475                    6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@477507                    6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@477570                    6307840 +- 0.0      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.chrome.blank system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976884123729708336

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4990427104542720


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment