New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 732783 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

31.7% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 478281:478369

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 13 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732783

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgttTy9wgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478280      158.7 +- 89.5485        21      good
chromium@478369      160.221 +- 92.9971      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976899090682997072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5331784125906944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Looks like something got reverted.  I think we can close this because the metric reverted to the previous mean.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478280      153.281 +- 67.0297      21      good
chromium@478369      169.455 +- 159.045      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976891097537225552

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5331784125906944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment