New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 732486 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 731841
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.5% regression in media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 477239:477282

Project Member Reported by chcunningham@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732486

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5sf7_AkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm_seek

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@477238      157470847 +- 4788382      21      good
chromium@477282      157381351 +- 3893827      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976968200494682672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5873595324039168


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm_seek

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@477238      157114574 +- 4812530      21      good
chromium@477282      157530862 +- 4329849      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976962810820272544

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5873595324039168


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017

Mergedinto: 731841
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Dale Curtis
  Commit : 24fca6fb8a70b95cae28843751485529e02378c0
  Date   : Wed Jun 07 03:50:37 2017
  Subject: Enable parallel decode requests for VpxVideoDecoder when offloading.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm_seek
  Change       : 3.45% | 154977039.667 -> 160317131.0

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@476905      154977040 +- 1663030      6      good
chromium@477402      156931381 +- 1914360      6      good
chromium@477526      157009217 +- 3318870      6      good
chromium@477534      158228446 +- 1417654      6      good
chromium@477536      158117969 +- 3763832      9      good
chromium@477537      161009394 +- 3900312      9      bad       <--
chromium@477538      161390428 +- 2785544      6      bad
chromium@477542      160260660 +- 3308631      9      bad
chromium@477557      160989356 +- 2908163      6      bad
chromium@477588      161305761 +- 1371192      6      bad
chromium@477650      160583708 +- 2434279      6      bad
chromium@477898      160317131 +- 1846395      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976886760740826768

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6133679484567552


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment