New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 732485 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.6% regression in media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 477239:477282

Project Member Reported by chcunningham@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Issue description

No ref graph here. Possibly noise
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732485

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglt6xvQsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm_seek

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@477238      157938594 +- 5140848      21      good
chromium@477282      157172097 +- 4594150      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976968268542342992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5515212247007232


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm_seek

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@477238      158011934 +- 5882705      21      good
chromium@477282      157592399 +- 4034976      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976962815124657824

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5515212247007232


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment