Issue 732483 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status:	Duplicate
Merged:	issue 732294
Owner:	----
Closed:	Jun 2017
Cc:	chcunningham@chromium.org
EstimatedDays:	----
NextAction:	----
OS:	----
Pri:	2
Type:	Bug-Regression
M-61

1.6%-3.9% regression in media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 477985:478158

Project Member Reported by chcunningham@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by chcunningham@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732483

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1oakrQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglrrSuQsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglrqkqAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5o2o_ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5q_7mQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1tis8AgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5u2OtAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-mac12-mini-8gb
chromium-rel-win10
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976968365906981824

Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:browser_process:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio_seek

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478019      14365337 +- 701419      21      good
chromium@478127      14310740 +- 619914      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogg.type.audio.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976968365906981824

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4542963721437184


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976963987756610352

Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976963982222368304

Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976963965241596048

Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976962820336342208

Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:browser_process:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio_seek

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478019      14359458 +- 644619      21      good
chromium@478127      14308575 +- 574416      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogg.type.audio.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976962820336342208

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4542963721437184


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Mergedinto: 732294
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Sam McNally
  Commit : cd0c21dfb32b6235c5c4bed740dac090b4e25bae
  Date   : Fri Jun 09 01:31:36 2017
  Subject: Enable PrefService by default.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:browser_process:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_crowd1080_vp9.webm
  Change       : 3.26% | 8824879.5 -> 9112415.5

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478066      8824880 +- 12832.9      6      good
chromium@478112      8825115 +- 16384.7      6      good
chromium@478135      8827316 +- 24708.3      6      good
chromium@478147      8824880 +- 12487.1      6      good
chromium@478153      8825805 +- 19260.6      6      good
chromium@478156      8823064 +- 23692.0      6      good
chromium@478157      9131815 +- 80170.2      6      bad       <--
chromium@478158      9112416 +- 19325.8      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd1080.vp9.webm media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976963982222368304

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6376771949166592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Sam McNally
  Commit : cd0c21dfb32b6235c5c4bed740dac090b4e25bae
  Date   : Fri Jun 09 01:31:36 2017
  Subject: Enable PrefService by default.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:browser_process:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm
  Change       : 3.36% | 8870491.83333 -> 9168633.83333

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@478066      8870492 +- 21814.6      6      good
chromium@478112      8863846 +- 11726.8      6      good
chromium@478135      8866657 +- 39880.0      6      good
chromium@478147      8867806 +- 16951.5      6      good
chromium@478153      8870640 +- 28723.7      6      good
chromium@478156      8862112 +- 37729.6      6      good
chromium@478157      9176293 +- 78613.3      6      bad       <--
chromium@478158      9168634 +- 76087.5      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976963987756610352

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5818291982958592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Sam McNally
  Commit : cd0c21dfb32b6235c5c4bed740dac090b4e25bae
  Date   : Fri Jun 09 01:31:36 2017
  Subject: Enable PrefService by default.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:browser_process:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.mp3_type_audio_seek
  Change       : 1.29% | 10917501.1429 -> 11058388.2857

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@478066      10917501 +- 2301380      14      good
chromium@478112      11040910 +- 1773227      14      good
chromium@478135      11110667 +- 1735132      21      good
chromium@478147      11062967 +- 1619613      14      good
chromium@478153      11096271 +- 1685625      21      good
chromium@478156      11076184 +- 1806912      21      good
chromium@478157      11253858 +- 1607319      9       bad       <--
chromium@478158      11058388 +- 2770338      14      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp3.type.audio.seek media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976963965241596048

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5322428344958976


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

►

Issue 732483 link

Issue metadata

1.6%-3.9% regression in media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 at 477985:478158

Issue description

Comment 1 by chcunningham@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Comment 1 Deleted

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 2 Deleted

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 3 Deleted

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 4 Deleted

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 5 Deleted

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 6 Deleted

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 7 Deleted

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 8 Deleted

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 9 Deleted

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 10 Deleted

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 11 Deleted

Sign in to add a comment