New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 732320 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

304.2%-2322% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 at 475342:475370

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@475341      43.9914 +- 173.846      21      good
chromium@475370      37.0377 +- 173.847      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977001593388686096

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6453597639802880


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Very noisy graph, the bots may not find this.
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@475341      36.5671 +- 168.657      21      good
chromium@475370      37.6859 +- 174.347      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976985457539767664

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6453597639802880


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@475200      33.4182 +- 170.304      21      good
chromium@475500      33.8412 +- 171.81       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976982349688795344

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5803871630262272


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@475200      46.8536 +- 170.135      21      good
chromium@475500      47.1163 +- 168.903      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976966594572430560

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5803871630262272


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
I think there's no hope of finding anything here. Closing.

Sign in to add a comment