New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 732317 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
█ alexclarke@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.5% regression in smoothness.tough_canvas_cases at 476151:476247

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732317

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgpqmPsAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: 971cd4520e7ab8c78c9e1b1ccc0c916a936b0378
  bad_revision : bf698306c4a097eb809fcf403c12e66358396747

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@476150      21.9047 +- 0.392483      21       good
chromium@476199      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@476200      22.065 +- 0.314841       9        bad
chromium@476247      21.9817 +- 0.260463      14       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_canvas_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977001655512006160

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5855408821895168


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@476100      22.004 +- 0.322489       21      good
chromium@476257      21.9909 +- 0.353336      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_canvas_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976909506523333120

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5134979866034176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@476150      22.0046 +- 0.428571      21      good
chromium@476247      21.964 +- 0.40488        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_canvas_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976906196923520512

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5855408821895168


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 14 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@476100      21.992 +- 0.381074       21      good
chromium@476257      21.9794 +- 0.362016      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_canvas_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976872223020292784

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5134979866034176


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 14 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
The bots are not finding anything, lets close this.
►

Sign in to add a comment