New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 732314 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
█ alexclarke@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.5% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 476761:476890

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732314

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg5v2CjgsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@476760      1013.06 +- 725.278      21      good
chromium@476890      970.153 +- 161.895      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977001711444004224

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854654786699264


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@476760      1021.07 +- 882.018      21      good
chromium@476890      960.332 +- 55.9072      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976993011792011264

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854654786699264


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@476700      1017.27 +- 915.994      21      good
chromium@476950      1013.18 +- 564.128      20      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976992436898571584

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5898637130858496


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@476700      1002.74 +- 766.555      21      good
chromium@476950      993.625 +- 473.178      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976974140169200384

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5898637130858496


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 13 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
The bots are not finding anything, closing.
►

Sign in to add a comment