Issue 732304 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status:	WontFix
Owner:	----
Closed:	Jun 2017
Cc:	█ alexclarke@chromium.org
EstimatedDays:	----
NextAction:	----
OS:	----
Pri:	2
Type:	Bug-Regression
Performance-Sheriff M-61 Performance-Loading

19.6%-22.4% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 477276:477374

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=732304

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1pzutAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglse9tgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgluaTgwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDglp_JpAsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia

Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977001863223278000

Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477282      2215.17 +- 1002.88      21      good
chromium@477374      2318.41 +- 1695.45      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977001863223278000

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5628858289618944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976993013348424160

Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976992702226709888

Comment 6 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Trying again, the graph suggests there is an alert.

Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976992661738716944

Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477282      2248.89 +- 785.897      21      good
chromium@477374      2258.5 +- 1071.64       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976993013348424160

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5628858289618944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477200      2269.2 +- 1278.76       21      good
chromium@477399      2378.26 +- 1927.05      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976992661738716944

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6452345656836096


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477200      2259.52 +- 859.007      21      good
chromium@477400      2758.09 +- 8976.68      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976992702226709888

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6623167243616256


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976986636390288320

Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976986631353771664

Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976985458838275840

Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976985455755463040

Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477282      2157.94 +- 1263.13      21      good
chromium@477374      2105.31 +- 923.2        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976986636390288320

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6357063954857984


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477275      2127.58 +- 1181.77      21      good
chromium@477370      2123.11 +- 947.037      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976986631353771664

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5037322644488192


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477200      2269.2 +- 1278.76       21      good
chromium@477399      2378.26 +- 1927.05      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976985458838275840

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6452345656836096


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976977915494797264

Project Member

Comment 19 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976977909389355648

Project Member

Comment 20 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477200      2147.67 +- 876.055      21      good
chromium@477400      2190.17 +- 1260.54      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976985455755463040

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6623167243616256


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 21 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477282      2157.94 +- 1263.13      21      good
chromium@477374      2105.31 +- 923.2        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976977909389355648

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6357063954857984


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Project Member

Comment 22 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_news/load_news_flipboard

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@477275      2341.58 +- 5170.11      21      good
chromium@477370      2075.42 +- 1390.4       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.flipboard system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976977915494797264

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5037322644488192


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 23 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 13 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)

The bots just aren't finding anything here. Lets close this.

►

Issue 732304 link

Issue metadata

19.6%-22.4% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 477276:477374

Issue description

Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Comment 1 Deleted

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 2 Deleted

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 3 Deleted

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 4 Deleted

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 5 Deleted

Comment 6 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 12 2017

Comment 6 Deleted

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 7 Deleted

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 8 Deleted

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 9 Deleted

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 10 Deleted

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 11 Deleted

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 12 Deleted

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 13 Deleted

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 14 Deleted

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 15 Deleted

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 16 Deleted

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 17 Deleted

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 18 Deleted

Comment 19 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 19 Deleted

Comment 20 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 20 Deleted

Comment 21 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 21 Deleted

Comment 22 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2017

Comment 22 Deleted

Comment 23 by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jun 13 2017

Comment 23 Deleted

Sign in to add a comment