Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.1% regression in v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 at 477435:477557 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 12 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977001893627112352
,
Jun 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/flickr Revision Result N chromium@477434 24305079 +- 686454 7 good chromium@477442 24167765 +- 605396 6 good chromium@477446 23949312 +- 262144 4 good chromium@477448 24255147 +- 605396 6 good chromium@477448,v8@8a15026270 24080384 +- 370728 6 good chromium@477449 25225899 +- 685261 6 bad chromium@477450 24890937 +- 941126 9 bad chromium@477465 25051136 +- 586172 4 bad chromium@477496 25225899 +- 685261 6 bad chromium@477557 25182208 +- 524288 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=flickr v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977001893627112352 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5568652914458624 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976909967796312144
,
Jun 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/flickr Revision Result N chromium@477434 24211456 +- 614782 6 good chromium@477442 24237670 +- 597780 5 good chromium@477446 24145920 +- 434717 4 good chromium@477448 24124075 +- 239304 6 good chromium@477448,v8@8a15026270 24155282 +- 610777 7 good chromium@477449 25138517 +- 685261 6 bad chromium@477450 25107310 +- 610777 7 bad chromium@477465 25225899 +- 576319 6 bad chromium@477496 24788992 +- 321060 6 bad chromium@477557 25182208 +- 642119 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=flickr v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8976909967796312144 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5568652914458624 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 10 2017
Most of these bugs re v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 should be handled through Issue 724262 .
,
Jul 11 2017
,
Jul 24 2017
The graph recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Jun 12 2017