Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
25.1% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 476254:476270 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Reilly Grant Commit : 64bff37c24aefed6abfc5066f8ff5c49e71072f7 Date : Thu Jun 01 13:31:01 2017 Subject: Ship WebUSB Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg/browse_tools/browse_tools_maps Change : 21.56% | 7.2515 -> 8.81483333333 Revision Result N chromium@476253 7.2515 +- 0.750078 6 good chromium@476262 7.14944 +- 1.66382 9 good chromium@476266 7.11967 +- 0.628572 6 good chromium@476267 8.65017 +- 0.963177 6 bad <-- chromium@476268 8.96667 +- 1.25484 6 bad chromium@476270 8.81483 +- 1.0378 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.tools.maps v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977258268953697056 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4953889951973376 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 9 2017