Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
106.4% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 477799:477972 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Alex Clarke Commit : cfd4fb5bd56f9e0f98668471a21f7f720cd5c311 Date : Thu Jun 08 10:26:12 2017 Subject: Pause virtual time until provisional navigations are committed Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_facebook_photos Change : 125.06% | 18.3045555556 -> 40.1638888889 Revision Result N chromium@477798 18.3046 +- 1.44026 9 good chromium@477885 22.5638 +- 25.4031 9 good chromium@477929 18.3384 +- 1.20459 9 good chromium@477932 24.4333 +- 38.4431 14 good chromium@477934 18.5345 +- 0.789298 6 good chromium@477935 40.8067 +- 12.0739 9 bad <-- chromium@477940 38.9415 +- 3.75578 6 bad chromium@477951 42.1977 +- 12.0989 6 bad chromium@477972 40.1639 +- 12.9056 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.facebook.photos v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977259059795613952 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6637877909258240 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 9 2017