Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.8%-57.1% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 477351:477562 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977267759211646208
,
Jun 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 9bb3bafb3347ac26c6dbbf78f9b77198f71eb8d5 bad_revision : 15d4665c38868df2b193a6051c1a1ce06138378b If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_ Revision Result N chromium@477350 397.968 +- 101.948 6 good chromium@477424 382.643 +- 55.7189 6 good chromium@477443 398.667 +- 105.538 8 good chromium@477452 414.059 +- 304.391 9 good chromium@477457 383.591 +- 44.5098 5 good chromium@477461 545.576 +- 75.8988 8 bad chromium@477498 544.69 +- 46.5356 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977267759211646208 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5615566070480896 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977253480889000208
,
Jun 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : mek Commit : c8e2b27f71c6792fa1072fa98a22c111ad229090 Date : Tue Jun 06 23:18:28 2017 Subject: Switch to mojo localstorage backend by default. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_ Change : 40.38% | 387.316 -> 543.722833333 Revision Result N chromium@477350 387.316 +- 101.475 6 good chromium@477424 378.333 +- 43.3089 6 good chromium@477443 388.406 +- 49.284 5 good chromium@477452 383.781 +- 49.2497 6 good chromium@477457 384.959 +- 50.0518 6 good chromium@477458 558.651 +- 72.1217 6 bad <-- chromium@477459 556.006 +- 55.229 6 bad chromium@477461 545.959 +- 46.3438 6 bad chromium@477498 543.723 +- 45.8426 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977253480889000208 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5615566070480896 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Jun 9 2017