Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.1% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 476633:476661 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977614436690509072
,
Jun 7 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: TIMEOUT The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: a19c77077f663f771e822ffb025d9cc607e9cf8e bad_revision : 582f3d53c92a020931828dc67e6a849db4f56f93 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : IC:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_instagram Change : 14.12% | 653.090666667 -> 745.3115 Revision Result N chromium@476632 653.091 +- 25.5024 6 good chromium@476647 661.987 +- 29.4532 6 good chromium@476661 745.311 +- 57.2024 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977614436690509072 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5813265965252608 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977430904498802832
,
Jun 8 2017
Blocking on crbug.com/731142 for the bot going purple while running tests.
,
Jun 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : IC:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_instagram Change : 12.31% | 650.242 -> 730.259333333 Revision Result N chromium@476632 650.242 +- 36.8143 6 good chromium@476647 655.871 +- 21.1327 6 good chromium@476654 662.024 +- 28.2674 6 good chromium@476656 666.067 +- 30.7794 9 good chromium@476656,v8@502c6ae6a0 728.021 +- 63.487 6 bad chromium@476656,v8@3b7ff7a5e5 727.864 +- 68.9376 6 bad chromium@476657 728.362 +- 89.1378 9 bad chromium@476658 749.771 +- 55.032 6 bad chromium@476661 730.259 +- 62.4637 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.instagram v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977430904498802832 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5813265965252608 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 13 2017
,
Jul 29 2017
Recovered since then. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jarin@google.com
, Jun 5 2017