Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.1%-29.2% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 475395:475493 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977855457653792416
,
Jun 3 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author kjellander@chromium.org === Hi kjellander@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : kjellander Commit : 99ce70bc4ae8d3a4c7431f875af32d978fb97965 Date : Tue May 30 07:01:22 2017 Subject: Revert of win: Set is_clang=true by default. (patchset #6 id:100001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2870543003/ ) Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : typed-array-set-from-typed/typed-array-set-from-typed Change : 11.03% | 852.349725319 -> 758.350549498 Revision Result N chromium@475417 852.35 +- 8.64146 6 good chromium@475432 854.939 +- 4.20595 6 good chromium@475440 853.265 +- 2.98306 6 good chromium@475444 854.229 +- 4.69568 6 good chromium@475446 853.619 +- 7.67131 6 good chromium@475447 757.698 +- 3.81858 6 bad <-- chromium@475477 758.351 +- 4.70912 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977855457653792416 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5661769114058752 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 5 2017
,
Jun 5 2017
Expected regression due to changing compiler.
,
Jun 21 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Jun 2 2017