New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 729066 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 10
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: ----
Type: ----



Sign in to add a comment

v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2 failing on 11 builders

Project Member Reported by simonhatch@chromium.org, Jun 2 2017

Issue description

Cc: nednguyen@chromium.org
this seems to have jumped from 13 m -> an hour or so

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: ab0c11df9302ab76649b00bd8ceba4dd7f886a11
  bad_revision : 30ff36523161aea9df5d4e787aac0bb9d532a205

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2
  Metric       : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@475576      13.1724 +- 0.623381      6      good
chromium@475663      34.5749 +- 27.5444       6      bad
chromium@475749      34.5772 +- 12.3274       6      bad
chromium@475921      31.2199 +- 18.5306       6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977879527403589312

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6228604939141120


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: ab0c11df9302ab76649b00bd8ceba4dd7f886a11
  bad_revision : 30ff36523161aea9df5d4e787aac0bb9d532a205

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2
  Metric       : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@475576      12.9694 +- 0.56081      6      good
chromium@475663      47.89 +- 31.4821        6      bad
chromium@475749      32.6005 +- 12.5775      6      bad
chromium@475921      29.1441 +- 6.75875      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-classic_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977819716084910560

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6228604939141120


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jun 4 2018

Labels: Hotlist-Recharge-Cold
Status: Untriaged (was: Available)
This issue has been Available for over a year. If it's no longer important or seems unlikely to be fixed, please consider closing it out. If it is important, please re-triage the issue.

Sorry for the inconvenience if the bug really should have been left as Available.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Archiving issues with no priority, no component and no owner

Sign in to add a comment