New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 728938 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
jgruber@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression


Participants' hotlists:
Hotlist-2


Sign in to add a comment

18% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 458797:458966

Project Member Reported by jgruber@chromium.org, Jun 2 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org, Jun 2 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=728938

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDghr_jvAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win8-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@458796      0.432871 +- 0.114504       21      good
chromium@458966      0.438205 +- 0.0809389      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977918272982914416

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6358780029173760


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@458796      0.432556 +- 0.0832772      21      good
chromium@459066      0.432034 +- 0.108323       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977904384937348112

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5534841287737344


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@458796      0.434838 +- 0.130773      21      good
chromium@458966      0.422723 +- 0.079524      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977902764241479568

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6358780029173760


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@458796      0.431582 +- 0.0919813      21      good
chromium@459066      0.42909 +- 0.0961755       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977891438843083008

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5534841287737344


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@458746      0.428977 +- 0.106384      21      good
chromium@459066      0.438104 +- 0.142573      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977891009724613776

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6145706835836928


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@458746      0.428268 +- 0.0962952      21      good
chromium@459066      0.432528 +- 0.109644       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977876338662102896

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6145706835836928


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 6 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@458296      0.427603 +- 0.100019      21      good
chromium@459466      0.439004 +- 0.115613      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977554325784686672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5836388324343808


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 6 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@458296      0.435912 +- 0.0944264      21      good
chromium@459466      0.426062 +- 0.137024       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977536601361004720

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5836388324343808


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 19 by jgruber@chromium.org, Jun 7 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Not reproducible
Project Member

Comment 20 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 7 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977536735024205632

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4722850608447488


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 22 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 8 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977442229235385600

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4722850608447488


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
►

Sign in to add a comment