Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 475305:475339 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978033740852967632
,
Jun 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978033740852967632 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5292663382736896 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978031108572316672
,
Jun 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978031108572316672 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5292663382736896 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977940225610299440
,
Jun 2 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed unexpectedly
Bisect was aborted with the following:
Step('Check bisect finished on revision chromium@475334.Expanding revision range for revision 74b683277b61ca81642c76386de81200860a12f1 on depot v8') failed with return_code 1
Bisect Details
Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile
Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science
Revision Result N
chromium@475304 6209609 +- 10211.7 5 good
chromium@475322 6223518 +- 42837.3 6 good
chromium@475331 6207814 +- 52980.3 9 good
chromium@475333 6214871 +- 49638.5 9 good
chromium@475334 6390082 +- 124256 6 bad
chromium@475335 6376189 +- 397694 14 bad
chromium@475339 6384271 +- 188042 9 bad
Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md
To Run This Test
src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Debug Info
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977940225610299440
Is this bisect wrong?
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6404194476490752
| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
| X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 2 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977902762939011760
,
Jun 2 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed unexpectedly
Bisect was aborted with the following:
Step('Check bisect finished on revision chromium@475334.Expanding revision range for revision 74b683277b61ca81642c76386de81200860a12f1 on depot v8') failed with return_code 1
Bisect Details
Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile
Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science
Revision Result N
chromium@475304 6209609 +- 10211.7 5 good
chromium@475322 6223518 +- 42837.3 6 good
chromium@475331 6207814 +- 52980.3 9 good
chromium@475333 6214871 +- 49638.5 9 good
chromium@475334 6390082 +- 124256 6 bad
chromium@475335 6376189 +- 397694 14 bad
chromium@475339 6384271 +- 188042 9 bad
Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md
To Run This Test
src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Debug Info
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977902762939011760
Is this bisect wrong?
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6404194476490752
| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
| X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Aug 17 2017
This is only a 160kib regression, looks like it's from the v8 roll in r475334, but after two months it seems unlikely we'll track down and fix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Jun 1 2017