New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 727765 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 473821:473878

Project Member Reported by liberato@google.com, May 30 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by liberato@google.com, May 30 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=727765

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgxqGcsAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@473820      20.8778 +- 7.5378      21      good
chromium@473878      22.8741 +- 31.675      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogg.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978150542087050096

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6338646027796480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_consumption_mwh/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@473820      21.4572 +- 7.48277      21      good
chromium@473878      21.1228 +- 2.62723      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogg.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978148122437964960

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6338646027796480


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment