Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.9% regression in media_perftests at 475132:475225 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978150674271225584
,
May 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sebmarchand Commit : 833aa96095e1f827ffc05af8bf545a094ffa6e35 Date : Sat May 27 01:34:31 2017 Subject: Changing default Windows compiler to VS2017 Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media_perftests Metric : sinc_resampler_convolve/unoptimized_aligned Change : 13.01% | 36350.2224114 -> 31635.581545 Revision Result N chromium@475131 36350.2 +- 159.006 9 good chromium@475178 35762.2 +- 5179.25 9 good chromium@475202 36351.9 +- 136.112 6 good chromium@475208 36378.9 +- 27.0673 6 good chromium@475211 35954.6 +- 1559.46 6 good chromium@475212 31617.7 +- 45.3801 6 bad <-- chromium@475213 31616.7 +- 63.9671 6 bad chromium@475214 31620.3 +- 52.4117 6 bad chromium@475225 31635.6 +- 63.7575 9 bad To Run This Test .\src\out\Release_x64\media_perftests.exe --single-process-tests Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978150674271225584 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5211969000308736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by liberato@google.com
, May 30 2017