Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-12.8% regression in media_perftests at 475132:475243 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978150738376531280
,
May 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sebmarchand Commit : 833aa96095e1f827ffc05af8bf545a094ffa6e35 Date : Sat May 27 01:34:31 2017 Subject: Changing default Windows compiler to VS2017 Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media_perftests Metric : vector_math_ewma_and_max_power/unoptimized Change : 1.24% | 50.0648463749 -> 49.4456306988 Revision Result N chromium@475131 50.0648 +- 0.0789713 6 good chromium@475178 50.0818 +- 0.0371776 6 good chromium@475202 50.0934 +- 0.0356849 6 good chromium@475208 50.0464 +- 0.105824 6 good chromium@475211 50.0955 +- 0.0384175 6 good chromium@475212 49.5571 +- 0.0811663 6 bad <-- chromium@475213 49.5794 +- 0.0257863 6 bad chromium@475214 49.5439 +- 0.100769 6 bad chromium@475225 49.4456 +- 0.302095 6 bad To Run This Test .\src\out\Release_x64\media_perftests.exe --single-process-tests Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8978150738376531280 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5852985353043968 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by liberato@google.com
, May 30 2017